Some say
the best measure of a society’s worth is how it treats its weakest members. Adversity is revealing...
It’s easier
in a sporting event. Not long after the
final seconds tick off the clock, the winning team receives a ticker tape
parade through the canyons of --- and keys to --- The City. The loser, in turn, must accept a bitter
pill, the consolation prize of measured reflection. Where did it all go wrong? How do we improve our chances of success next time? In the sports with the good sense to provide
a level playing field, a team can and does live to fight another day. Never is there consideration of whether there
will be food enough to eat on the night of defeat.
In a free, democratic society that puts all its eggs in the economic basket of capitalism based on the British model, somehow it’s just not as simple. But the ordinary citizen has come a long way. Trials, tribulations and progress in the pursuit of happiness – real victories - can be quantified with consensus objectivity.
Let’s put economic considerations aside for the moment. It may have cost the nation almost 650,000 lives, but we were finally able to correct the one gaping injustice of our social contract. The simple idea of extending constitutional protection to the black man came to pass. About half a century later, women were granted the full right of participation in the voting booth. In another half century, due process and equal protection of the laws gave these basic civil rights some teeth. Today, we are yet another half century removed.
In economic terms, the Republican administrations of 1920-1932 represented the climax of total cooperation between big business survival of the fittest and laissez-faire government in partnership. A period of unprecedented material prosperity, especially for private business interests, culminated during the 1928 presidential campaign. Then candidate Herbert Hoover had stated that “We in America today are nearer to the final triumph over poverty than ever before in the history of any land” and “given a chance to go forward with the policies of the last eight years, we shall soon with the help of God be in sight of the day when poverty will be banished from this nation.” Stock prices were reaching what had looked like a permanently high plateau.
Upon
Mr. Hoover’s election it was being said that national leadership could not be
in safer or more expert hands. Respected
economists noted that for the first time in the nation’s history “we have a
President who, by technical training, engineering achievement, cabinet
experience, and grasp of economic fundamentals, is qualified for business
leadership.” For his part, President
Hoover in his March 1929 inaugural address stated that “I have no fears for the
future of our country. It is bright with
hope.”
No
one, perhaps, was better suited to anticipate catastrophe than President
Hoover. Following a successful
entrepreneurial career with an engineering background in the private sector, he
served for almost eight years as Secretary of Commerce before ascending to the
presidency. This provided him with a
unique opportunity to observe the workings and influence the policies of the
American business system. But seeing all
problems from the viewpoint of business, the federal government which he now
headed “had mistaken the class interest (of business) for the national
interest. The result was both class and
national disaster.”
In late October 1929, a matter of just
a few months following President Hoover’s inauguration, the stock market
crashed, ushering in the greatest economic downturn in US History. The
Great Depression lasted a full, painful 10 years. How bad did it get? One statistic is telling. The unemployment rate rose from 3% in the first year to 9% to 16% to an astonishing 24% in the fourth and final year of the Hoover
presidency.
That’s a lot of vanquished ordinary people. When asked whether he felt the capacity for
human suffering to be without limit, a banker reportedly replied, “I think
so.” Invoking moral justification, many
conservatives regarded federal aid to idle workers as spelling the end of the
republic.
Consistent with these sentiments, President
Hoover reminded the ordinary citizen of what had become the basic philosophy of
the Republican Party: The Great Depression was nothing more than a “temporary
slump in a fundamentally strong economy” and that government intervention to
combat its baneful effects was both “unnecessary and unwise.” Stubbornly, he refused to act. Vilified
over the years for his failure to act, perhaps rightly so, President Hoover
believed that relief should come from the private sector, not the government.
As a result, a capitalist system which denied
work or relief to the unemployed millions was increasingly called into critical
doubt. But rugged individualism was dead nonetheless. Both real estate and farm commodity prices had collapsed. Banks effectively ceased to operate. While the heart of industry was only beating faintly, the private sector offered nothing. It had failed. The 1932 election would provide a last chance for politics.
(Editor’s
note: The second and middle segment in
this three part series introduces readers to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the
plight of the vanquished and the creation of a new order, which the ordinary citizen has come to know as F.D.R.'s “New Deal” with its accompanying social safety net.)
-Michael D'Angelo
I seem to recall reading about a number of public works projects started under Hoover, including the Hoover Dam and the bridges on the Pacific Coast Highway in California. I think it is unfair to imply that Hoover did not attempt to put Americans to work.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, Hoover attempted to put people to work and stimulate the economy while still trying to balance the budget. Keynes' treatise on the beneficial effects of deficit spending was still a few years in the future.
Similarly FDR ran on a balanced budget in the 1932 election. Fortunately he saw the benefit of deficit spending after he was elected, at least for a few years. You may recall that FDR attempted to balance the budget in FY's 1937-38, only to get a double dip recession. The tremendous deficit spending during the war years ultimately ended the Great Depression.
The "some" in your "some say..." was, uh, Jesus of Nazareth, wasn't it?
ReplyDelete-dlj.
Hi dlj! Yes, you are correct!
Delete