(Editor’s note: This is the second and final segment in a two
part series, introducing readers to the Industrial Revolution and one of its iconic heroes. To view the first segment, click here.)
What, if anything, is the duty of the rich man to society, according to one of the most iconic and storied rich men of early industrial America?
While the industrial robber barons of the Gilded Age were said only to flash their great wealth to the masses, Andrew Carnegie, for one, articulated a call for these wealthy business titans
of industry to return their wealth to society. This illustrates Lesson 3 (of 4) of US History. The king of steel strongly believed that the rich man
had not the option, but rather a corresponding duty, to voluntarily return his wealth to society from whence it
came.
Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth writings set forth a model of how the wealthy man should conduct his life. First, the capitalist’s primary goal was to make money. But he should then live only modestly, so as to bring no undue attention to himself. Then, since the rich man had figured out how to achieve great wealth in the first place, he alone should choose how to spend that wealth. Whether on charity, society, science, or any other worthy cause, in his sole discretion, he should accomplish all this before he dies.
According to Carnegie, it would be a curse for a rich man to die with money in the bank, and which the government could then get its hands on by mechanisms such as the inheritance tax. In the end, if all went according to plan, the rich man who made it would, in turn, give it all away freely, the government involved neither while making the money, nor spending it in the end.
Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth writings set forth a model of how the wealthy man should conduct his life. First, the capitalist’s primary goal was to make money. But he should then live only modestly, so as to bring no undue attention to himself. Then, since the rich man had figured out how to achieve great wealth in the first place, he alone should choose how to spend that wealth. Whether on charity, society, science, or any other worthy cause, in his sole discretion, he should accomplish all this before he dies.
According to Carnegie, it would be a curse for a rich man to die with money in the bank, and which the government could then get its hands on by mechanisms such as the inheritance tax. In the end, if all went according to plan, the rich man who made it would, in turn, give it all away freely, the government involved neither while making the money, nor spending it in the end.
And Carnegie acted. As
part of his considerable financial legacy, Carnegie, the king of steel, donated substantial sums
for a pension relief fund to the families of killed and injured workers, based
on merit, and not given indiscriminately.
Additionally, he made bequests to build 67 libraries forming the backbone
of the venerable New York City public library
system and some 1,689 public libraries in the US during his lifetime. The program was expanded to include church
organs. Lastly, he made a gift to
establish the International Court
at the Hague ,
in support of a world court of arbitration, where international disputes could
be resolved without resort to war.
As
the so-called “Apostle of Peace,” Carnegie has been quoted as saying: “We have
abolished the duel. Let it be our race
that truly takes the first step to abolish international dueling.” And Carnegie (remember, the year was 1910, before the World Wars) had also stated:
The whole matter is so simple … Germany , Great
Britain and the US coming together (somewhat
covertly) to form a joint police force to maintain peace is all that is needed.
But the impact of the Industrial Revolution
on American society was not all positive.
Neither were the results all pretty, nor without a heavy price. Consider that the process
generated a sink full of dirty dishes. The growth of corporations and trusts
raised immense amounts of targeted capital but, importantly, decreased social
responsibility. Materialism was pronounced
over all other values. Natural resources
were exploited, despoiling the land, to increase profits. Wealth and industry, over production, people
and politics, became overly concentrated.
This, in turn, led to corrupt political machines led by party bosses,
the overcrowding of cities, the straining of resources and services. It also necessitated the combination of
diverse cultural groups which were unfamiliar with American city life or each
other.
Moreover,
American industrial workers faced deteriorating labor conditions. Women, children and the unskilled immigrant
factory worker were exploited, suffering work conditions which could perhaps
best be described as unsafe, inhumane and produced substandard products. Hours were excessive, on a daily and weekly
basis. Wages failed to keep pace with
the cost of living. Still, the abundant supply
of cheap, new, unskilled immigrant workers greatly exceeded the supply of new
factory jobs in the nation’s big industrial cities.
Workers
also faced strong opposition not only from their employers but also the courts. Government policy and judicial decisions
fiercely protected not the industrial worker but the entrepreneurial spirit of
American businessmen to lead by way of innovation. Sweatshop working conditions and stagnant
wages stimulated a movement toward the formation of labor unions. However, attempts at unionization led to
violent confrontations between big business and
government in tandem against the interests of labor.
One
thing was clear: America
was making more products than it could consume. This factor, added to the free-for-all, further stimulated unstable economic cycles of boom
and bust that produced unrest on farms.
Due to increasing productivity, farmers faced declining prices for their
crops, as well as a diminution of their land, with laws and government
interest in protecting neither. Land
foreclosures skyrocketed.
Instability spawned a first of its kind political movement, a populist wing of the Democratic Party traced to the protection of the nation’s agrarian and common man labor interests. Dramatized by William Jennings Bryan, “The Great Commoner,” “on the wings of a single great speech about a cross of gold,” it rose briefly to political prominence but ultimately failed and was swept away by 1896.
In cities, living conditions degenerated into tenement slums filled with crime and poverty, racism and nativism. Advances in transportation, specifically the railroad, exacerbated segregated living arrangements for an increasingly diverse cultural society. And the entire process, given the magnitude and swiftness of the forces of change, fueled a painless escape to drugs.
Instability spawned a first of its kind political movement, a populist wing of the Democratic Party traced to the protection of the nation’s agrarian and common man labor interests. Dramatized by William Jennings Bryan, “The Great Commoner,” “on the wings of a single great speech about a cross of gold,” it rose briefly to political prominence but ultimately failed and was swept away by 1896.
In cities, living conditions degenerated into tenement slums filled with crime and poverty, racism and nativism. Advances in transportation, specifically the railroad, exacerbated segregated living arrangements for an increasingly diverse cultural society. And the entire process, given the magnitude and swiftness of the forces of change, fueled a painless escape to drugs.
The ultimate
result and impact, it has been said,
was a society in chaos, seeking reform. This was the state of affairs as the American industrial machine rolled into the 20th century.
-Michael D’Angelo
No comments:
Post a Comment