Did we have to attain higher education than kindergarten to learn the first lesson of US History?
The first lesson of US History comes by way of the classic 1966 movie, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, starring Clint Eastwood, among others, in one of his early, featured roles.
The first lesson of US History comes by way of the classic 1966 movie, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, starring Clint Eastwood, among others, in one of his early, featured roles.
The setting is the state of Texas, during the Civil War early
1860s. Texas ,
as some may recall, was a slave state in the fledgling Confederate States of America . For the better part of the movie, Clint
Eastwood (the “Good”) and Tuco, his Mexican counterpart (the “Ugly”, played by
Eli Wallach), engage in a systematic series of Western, small town
robberies.
The script did not deviate from the
following. Tuco would get himself
arrested for the commission of a serious capital offense, which called for his
hanging in the public square. Customarily,
the town residents would come out to witness the hanging. While the noose was being prepared, and the
prisoner brought forth, Eastwood would rob all of the vacant homes. Just before the noose would tighten, Eastwood
would appear on horseback. With his
excellent aim, he would shoot through the rope from a distance, freeing
Tuco. Simultaneously, Eastwood would
ride through the square, displaying perfect timing to snatch him up and ride
off. The two would repeat the sequence
in the next town.
Although very different and caring little for
the welfare of the other, each is compelled to keep the other alive,
because each has half a secret. Together, they know that a large stash of
money, containing exactly 8 bags of gold, is buried in a cemetery. Eastwood knows the name of the grave under
which the stash is buried, and Tuco knows the name of the cemetery. But, neither knows the other’s secret. Lacking a corresponding bond of trust, each guards his half of the
secret with his life. A third player, a
corrupt Union Army officer (the “Bad”, played by Lee Van Cleef), sheds his
military uniform for civilian clothes and secretly follows the two for what he
hopes will be his own private payoff.
Toward the movie’s climax, Tuco finally gives
up his share of the secret, reluctantly disclosing the name of the
cemetery. The three then come together
at the cemetery circle, near the grave site where the gold is buried. But since Eastwood will not voluntarily divulge
the name on the grave, they engage in a final stand off. After some tense moments that seem like
hours, Eastwood draws first, killing Van Cleef (the “Bad”). Eastwood then admits to Tuco that he had secretly
removed the bullets from Tuco’s gun the previous night, which had rendered harmless Tuco’s
stand off threat.
Viewers are left with the “Good” and the
“Ugly”. With a loaded gun, the entire
loot at his disposal and Tuco absent any weapon and defenseless, Eastwood now faces
a moral dilemma. Does he take all the
gold, and run? In the process, what does
he do with Tuco? Kill him? Wound him?
If he allows Tuco to live, does he leave Tuco his full share? Or, does he leave just a portion, in
Eastwood’s sole but arbitrary discretion?
It is an interesting dilemma, not vastly
different from the one which faced the early Old World European settler to the
continent of North America , upon facing his brethren, the American Indian.
In the end, Eastwood rides off into the
sunset, with his own 4 bags of gold securely mounted to his saddle bags. He leaves Tuco stranded and thirsty in the
sweltering Texas
sun, without a horse, and with a difficult situation in which to make his way
back to civilization. But, importantly,
Eastwood leaves Tuco with his entire share, fully 4 gold bags. For, when one thinks about it, how much of
the gold do any of us really need?
The New World
was a land of plenty, so called, but its historical relationship with the
native American Indian culture was marked by contact, conquest and catastrophe,
the three “C’s”. Simple contact was the
predominant destructive force. The Old World germs
to which the settler had become immune effectively wiped out 90% of the
indigenous Indian population, whose systems were not similarly protected. Second was the idea of forced
“removal” of the Indians from their lands. And, of
course, there were mass killings. But,
this was the side show.
We all learned the first lesson of US History
by the time of kindergarten. There is
more than enough to go around. The
lesson, of course, is to share.
-Michael
D’Angelo
No comments:
Post a Comment