(Editor’s note: This is the second segment in a three part series. The first segment traced
happiness to Thomas Jefferson’s 1776 Declaration of Independence. It outlined Alexander Hamilton’s vision in
implementing a financial system of capitalism for the republic with the new
constitution.)
Yes, Hamilton ’s
plan conceived a new class of speculative wealth and money-making, created out
of thin air and to be endorsed by the full faith and credit of the US
government. Members of Congress, as well
as the bankers and speculators, all more or less positioned on the inside, were
the earliest plan subscribers and beneficiaries. By and through its undertaking the new federal
government created a system of preference for the so called moneyed class over
the remaining classes of society that were not moneyed.
Nevertheless, understanding that this model
had achieved unsurpassed economic dominance on the world stage through the
British, Hamilton ’s
financial plan placed the new nation upon a solid economic foundation. Moreover, the plan placed the new nation on a
course for more than two centuries worth of unprecedented economic growth and
prosperity for the masses of ordinary citizens. It certainly turned out to be a wise decision
--- for empire.
But, almost immediately upon enactment, Hamilton ’s financial plan
was the subject of intense criticism and attack. On the one hand, there could be little doubt
that it was a practical plan. The nation
needed a stable, secure banking system, without which the established European
powers would supply neither loans nor credit.
It was also expedient. Its proponents
pointed for validation to a proven model.
But on the other hand, it was self-serving, Hamilton being a resident of New York with a multitude of personal and
professional connections in the financial arena. It unfairly and disproportionately rewarded
Northern bankers at the expense of Southern farmers, thereby heightening
sectional differences. It created a
preference for two distinct economic classes: the haves – and have nots.
It may come as no surprise, then, that Jefferson
himself, the Secretary of State in President Washington’s cabinet, was the
primary objector to what he viewed as Hamilton ’s
perversion of the idyllic pursuit of happiness.
But his objection had little to do either with numbers, economics or
speculation.
According to Jefferson ,
the essence of the pursuit of happiness commenced with the removal of all forms
of arbitrary, artificial or hereditary distinctions, influences or preconceived
ideas. The desire was to attain full,
unencumbered intellectual and religious freedom of the mind, unconstrained by
previous efforts to set authoritative delineation using lenses and
filters. Absent these external
influences and thus empowered, the mind would exist in a completely and
intellectually free state: to master its environment and attain its natural potentialities. Central was the belief in the improvability
of the human mind and the limitless progress of human knowledge.
The author of the document which set forth
that “all men are created equal” viewed with consternation a plan which would
not treat all men equally under the law.
Such a plan violated the unfettered freedom of the individual citizen to
pursue happiness. It flowed from principles adverse to liberty, accomplished
by creating an influence of the US Treasury
over members of Congress, inherently susceptible to corruption. With the grant of inherent privileges
artificially conferred upon certain of its benefactors, the plan tended to
narrow the government into fewer hands and approximate it to a hereditary form.
In a later period, Andrew Jackson would
declare war on and victory over Hamilton ’s
federal banking system. In the throes of
battle, Jackson astutely observe that “If the people only understood the rank
injustice of our money and banking system there would be a revolution before
morning.”
For his own part, Theodore Roosevelt had an
interesting insight as to what was happiness:
But for unflagging interest and enjoyment, a household
of children, if things go reasonably well, certainly makes all other forms of
success and achievement lose their importance by comparison. It may be true that he travels farthest who travels
alone; but the goal thus reached is not worth reaching. And as for a life deliberately devoted to
pleasure as an end – why, the greatest happiness is the happiness that comes as
a by-product of striving to do what must be done, even though sorrow is met in
the doing.
(Next week’s third and final segment will
explore The Pursuit of Happiness from the realm of Eastern Civilization, dating to a time period centuries prior to
the American founding fathers.)
-Michael D’Angelo
Jefferson seemed to view the idea of the "pursuit of happiness" through the Rousseauian lense of his First and Second Discourse. Did man only have the key to happiness in his natural state? Is the pursuit of happiness really the dream to return to the Garden? Even in a state of nature there are have's and have nots, how or why would anyone want to try and level the field artificially? This road only provides disappointment. Maybe happiness lies in the chase or pursuit? Not in the final destination.
ReplyDelete